Help! What is this?


#125

I'm not sure about that, there should be two sets, each of 6 cubes and 98% should be well above the requirements of either set lol. So, I'm guessing there's a bug (or more) in the activity tracker (thing above screen which shows cubes+accuracy) and/or in the tutorials themselves.

If at any point you want to give the lv2 tuts another go and you keep having this prob. I'd suggest emailing HQ: support@eyewire.org with a screenshot of any console errors (red in F12 in chrome windows) and/or cube Id(s) of the prob, plus a screenshot or more of the cube's 2D+3D.

and yw :slight_smile:


#126

Thank you, will continue trying and if it doesn't work will proceed as mentioned.


#127

Hi! I was working on this cube (#2722101) when, for some reason, even though the long segment in the middle was all dark blue, it was marked as incorrect when I submitted the cube. Is that a mistake? Thanks!


#128

I'm afraid you played a cube that was a wrong seed merger, meaning the AI created a wrong seed from parent, there was no way for you to know of (thankfully it doesn't happen often) and so all of the wrong seed and whatever was added on it had to be removed and replaced with the correct trace (the yellow thing seen with scout tools). From what I can see in the pic you did trace that correctly even if you couldn't see that it was ultimately wrong, not by any fault of yours.


#129

If this happens, is the accuracy of the player that traced the cube negatively affected?


#130

Unfortunately yes, but it's only 1 cube in 60 so less of a damage and should go out of the 60 roll faster.


#131

Twister did a test and found that seed removal doesnt affect player accurcies. However anything a person adds to a bad seed will affect their accuracy.


#132

Hey - question, WHY in world is my accuracy 0% on this?
It shows no missing parts, no incorrect parts - only correct parts.
I trailblaized it and got immediately 0% accuracy.
This hapened several times and really brought down my accuracy, which is annoying.
Is this something I'm doing wrong? Can I fix it?
Is the browser important in this matter? (It's Firefox 58.0.2 btw)
Or do I just have to live with these inexplainable random 0% accuracies?
Or did I miss something?

Thanks for help..


#133

Hi Just_someone_curious,

I'm sorry to hear you're experiencing this bug. Thank you for reporting! What is odd, is that I see in your screenshot previous trailblazes done by you are reporting correctly as a white dot with 100% accuracy. I'm not sure why this one showed up as a red dot with 0%. We're looking into the bug.

Best,
M.


#134

Okay, thank you!
At least I'm not the only one cunfused by this.. =D


#135

It did it again..
This time it wasn't immediately.
Maybe it just displayes the trace of others wrong? Like, five poeple submitted it (very shortly after I did) and had a different trace?
Maybe it's actually 0% acccuracy, but it doesn't show as incorrect?
I don't know..


#136

Hi:

I am very new. 24 hours young.

I found this on a review. I just wondering if it is right, or all right. Thanks::slight_smile:

Another View:


#137

Hi, welcome to ew! That looks like a merger, see how in the 2D in 1st pic the red are outside the borders of the green stuff? That's no good lol, it's what we call a merger. (do !merger in chat for more info on them).

Hope this helps.


#138

Thank you Nseraf:

Being new, I did not want to jump in and assume that. Reading about mergers, that's what it looked like. I have had tracing reviews mark me wrong for not marking some of the same.

This is a great thing. A game that means something. I must remember to look up the forum maker, it's great also.

I am looking up mergers now. Thanks again.

03:32 am -- Followed WiKi directions and mailed Merger to support.

Thanks again. Keep up the great work! :smiley:


#139

youre welcome :slight_smile:
you can also ask for merger assistance in chat :slight_smile:


#140

CUBE #2868482 Theres a small piece at the end that the consensus got wrong, pretty sure. It's marked in red here. Note that my 2D is rotated axis. The AI probably missed it because of the one bright slide.

This is two questions, Am I right and are these tiny mistakes worth reporting? I imagine this would get found and corrected in some future stitching operation.


#141

that's actually a piece previous ppl missed but you added, it's not a merger so your % in your profile should be ok, and report any mergers yeah but this is what we call dust so this missing doesn't need reporting but if you have anything large then feel free to report and someone should reap it in.

Hope this helps.


#142

Thanks for your clear answers.


#143

So is this considered large or still dust? CUBE #2870377


#144

it's not an "exact science" lol, but altho it's a large dust it is dust b/c it doesn't add to the shape of the neuron, here's a couple of examples of what usually is reaped in by scythes:

missing branch:

missing nub:

now, branches and nubs are not exactly "if it's this large add if not ignore" they can be smaller or larger but they add to the shape of the neuron if added.

Also that red in your cube is a merger, I've marked pic yellow for seed and red for additions, can you see the -faint- borders between them?

hope this helps.