Why do scientists hate philosophy of science?

Steven Weinberg, Nobel laureate in physics, is pretty dismissive when it come to the work of contemporary philosophers of science. Basically, he thinks that philosophers don’t have sufficient knowledge of science in order to make philosophical claims about it. He is by no means alone in his thinking.

Is Weinberg right about the philosophy of science or does it have something meaning and informed to say about modern science?


I didn’t find the right solution from the internet.
Industrial Animation Video

In someway every scientist is also a philosopher because they are thinking to find a solution on a problem.


In some way every philosopher is also a scientist because they seek to gain and discover knowledge about a topic.