This maybe something that has been discussed before.
This is frustrating when trying to get the 6 cubes at greater than 80% in a row!
Good practice, though
or discouraging enough to make me stop playing…
Well, yes, it can be frustrating, although I’m sure you realize everyone here encountered the same thing.
But note that “accuracy” isn’t about the accuracy of the final trace – it’s about your accuracy. If you have 10% of the trace to do, your accuracy comes only from how accurately you do that 10%. If you trace not only the correct 10% but also an additional 10%, your accuracy rating isn’t 90%; it’s 50% - half of your work was right, half was wrong. If you trace 10% but it’s the wrong 10%, you’re not 90% accurate; you’re 0% accurate.
A belated thanks for your query, tracer911. It does happen that our developers and neuroscience squad are frequently re-examining our accuracy algorithm, and there was even a meeting about it today. I believe any updates to the algorithm are currently under wraps, but if you would ever like to find out more about the current setup, I suggest e-mailing email@example.com
Actually, the query was from arising, who I suspect simply gave up.